jump to navigation

Matthew 15 vs Mark 7 April 13, 2009

Posted by relsdork in God, bible, christian, religion, scripture.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

Matthew draws from Mark’s accounts in many instances. There’s are several interesting differences in the accounts, however, one of them being Matthew 15, when a Gentile woman asks for her daughter to be healed. Jesus responds that the children’s food should not be thrown to the dogs.

In Mark, whose account is probably more accurate (being that Mark knew Jesus and worked closely with his disciples after Jesus death, and also because Mark is the earliest gospel account) Jesus responds, “Let us first feed the children…” (emphasis mine).

Both accounts are harsh and both accounts show Jesus learning from the Gentile woman. However, Mark’s version shows a Jesus conscious of the changing paradigm (that God is not exclusively for the Jews, but for all).

Reasons I Love Wayne Meeks April 8, 2009

Posted by relsdork in bible, christian, religion, scripture.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

My newest educational toy is my Bible edited by Wayne A. Meeks. Upon its arrival, I tore open its packaging and drooled over the amount of footnotes. I also think I need to purchase a couple other books to further boost my studies. I’ll look into those soon.

In any case, as I caught myself up to my current chapter in Matthew in my new Bible, here are some notes I made, all courtesy of the lovely editor’s notes in my new Bible.

Literally, “Messiah” or “Christ” is “The Anointed.” Kings and priests were anointed with oils.

Matthew traces Jesus to Abraham, the father of the Chosen People, but also “ancestor of a multitude of nations,” which can be taken to include the Gentiles.

The women included in Matthew’s genealogy were Gentiles or Jewesses with irregular sexual unions considered important for God’s plan (logos?), like Mary.

When Matthew concludes Jesus’ genealogy, he divides the generations into groups of 14. Fourteen is the numerical value of David’s name.

Oftentimes the word “virgin” is more accurately translated “young woman.”

The light in your eye… the passage in Matthew (6.22-23) which speaks of light and darkness is better understood in the original language and context. It reads, “If your eye is unhealthy, your whole body will be full of darkness” (NRSV). The word translated here as “unhealthy” is literally “evil.” The translator chose “unhealthy” because of the connotations of “evil” in the English language. However, if you understand the context, you understand the phrase is different than it looks at face value in English. An evil eye was a metaphor for jealousy. Recalling courses on both Religion and Anthropology and Jewish Mysticism, I can also submit that in some traditions, the evil eye can even do one harm. Some cultures will mark the faces of beautiful children to avoid the evil eye. Protective makeup and amulets are also often employed. In any case, this passage speaks truth– jealousy is consuming. When one can be free of jealousy, one can be free to love more openly and embrace God’s light. When seen through these lenses, the passage also makes more sense with the passage following, which talks about serving God vs. serving wealth.

Both Matthew and Paul indicate that Peter was married.

Naming is an act of power. When demons call Jesus “Son of God,” they are attempting to gain power over the exorcist.

I knew a lot of this stuff, but was reminded of how interesting it was/how often people don’t know it upon reading it. So enjoy. Try not to let your brain dribble out your ear.

More Translation Problems April 2, 2009

Posted by relsdork in bible, christian, religion, scripture, struggle.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

Jesus heals many conditions in the gospels. Most often, however, the Bible speaks of Jesus healing leprosy. The word translated as leprosy is “unclean,” which is how such diseases were often seen. Sin was related to health; ritual was related to health. While “unclean” often meant things like leprosy, it was not the only condition.

My question is not one I can answer on my own. It stems from what I know about Jewish ritual. Menstruation and ejaculation could make one unclean. Quite often, people were considered unclean without visible evidence of this state (often my mere exposure to another’s “uncleanliness”). Purity laws required rituals to make one clean again. They also required Jews to follow certain restrictions for periods of time after one was made unclean. Unclean people were to stay out of certain areas and often were prohibited from making physical contact with those who were ritually clean. (That’s half of what the story of the Good Samaritan is about– Jews not wanting to compromise their purity status by touching someone who was unclean.)

So my question is: Did Jesus heal an actual illness, or did he pronounce ritually unclean people as clean, by authority of God (also following the “legality is oftentimes silly” motif)? I could perhaps shed more light on this issue if I knew Koine Greek.

Of course, this is only relevant to Jesus’ healings of “unclean” conditions. Blindness and paralysis are different animals entirely.

Where are my Mother and Brothers? March 30, 2009

Posted by relsdork in bible, christian, religion, scripture, struggle.
Tags: , , , , ,
1 comment so far

The gospels tell an account of Jesus’ disciples interrupting him one day to tell him that his mother and brothers had come. Jesus asks who his mother and brothers are and answers that it is they who hear the word of God and live it.

It’s a nice sentiment– family is universal. True compassion requires us to expand our ideas of “family” and “neighbor.” These themes arise again and again in Jesus’ ministry.

However, it’s dawned on me that other passages refer to Jesus’ family having a negative reaction to his ministry. In fact, most references to Jesus’ family (after he began his ministry) do.

  • Is it possible that Jesus doesn’t want to talk to his family?
  • Is it possible that Jesus is criticizing his family for not hearing God’s word?
  • Is it possible that Jesus’ family was coming to stop him?