My Tea is Cold March 19, 2009
Posted by relsdork in God, bible, christian, environment, nature, religion, scripture.Tags: religion, christianity, process theology, jesus, bible, God, scripture, comparative religious studies, religious studies, nature, hebrew scriptures, liberal
add a comment
So when I sat down to begin my Bible study, I had a giant mug of piping hot, fresh green tea. It’s now cold and I haven’t drank any of it, because I got incredibly excited and somehow just lost 2 hours of my life in scripture without noticing it. I still have more scripture to read through and some other reading to complete, as per my Lenten commitment.
ANYWAY…
Tonight I got to the Sermon on the Mount, in Matthew. If you’ve ever wondered why it is on a mountain in Matthew and on a plain in Luke, here you go: Matthew is writing for a Jewish audience and therefore, his placement of Jesus on a mountain has Mosaic parallels which resonate with his audience. Similarly, Luke is writing for a Hellenistic audience, who appreciates more a Jesus who stands level with them, as an equal.
On a similar note, within this lovely speech, Jesus says (in Matthew), “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” The funny thing about that, though, is that the word which is translated as “perfect” from the Greek, means something very different in the original. It means something more to the effect of: “live to your maximum potential.” In short, “give God’s work your all.” Again, however, there is a difference in Luke’s version, which doesn’t say perfect at all, but rather says “compassionate.” This is, again, because Luke is writing to a Greek audience. Because Greek ethics are more situational, the epitome of goodness in Greek society is compassion, and therefore it makes most sense to think of “perfection” as “compassion.”
Might I add that both of these “revised” translations make marvelous sense when viewed from a lens of process theology.
Next, I came upon the section of the sermon in Matthew which talks about the Law (beginning at 5.17). This section is unique to Matthew. Interesting, considering that Matthew was the writer orienting his words toward a Jewish audience. Could this view have been unique to Jewish Christianity, or was this something that simply wouldn’t have been emphasized or made much sense to a gentile audience?
Also, way back in my first year of college, I recall my RelS 99 professor saying that it was likely that the Pharisees were not so much an enemy of the Jesus movement (the Sadducees seem the more likely suspects). In scripture, however, they certainly take the most criticisms oriented toward Judaism’s legal system. I don’t know that his view represents scholarly consensus, but going over my notes from RelS 151, I now know why that theory makes sense– the Pharisees are anti-Hellenization. For a splinter group of Jews proselytizing to gentiles, Hellenization was their friend. In Jesus’ death, the gospel was for everyone and the Pharisees became the angry old ladies at church who didn’t want to see change.
And on a mostly unrelated note….
The Tree of Knowledge of Life and Death… my notes say, “God puts the tree there so that Adam knows he can exist without it.” This cyclical world, where it is easy to fall subject to ennui and lose touch with our spiritual sides, where it seems quite simple to live subject only to the laws of physics, is infused with spirit, hidden within metaphorical hedges… We are better than lives of routine and common courtesy. We needn’t be sucked into such mundane existences if we continue to eat from the Tree of Life, to grow ourselves in God and Spirit in ways that cannot be broken by the laws of this world. True knowledge and spirituality transcend time and space so that they daily land us in our inner Edens.
“There are two trees in the garden… and too much of religion is stuck at the wrong tree. Does it bring Life? Eat from that tree.”
–Rev. Yvette Flunder
Our goal is to be in the world, but not of it– to fully engage in this world and delve into the majesty of Nature, but understand that pure physicality is not enough to nourish our souls. Whatever magical experience a tromp through the forest might provide us, it can only ever be elevated by praying while we dig our fingers into the soil…
I guess it’s true that if we seek, we find. Even more true, however, is that the more I seek, the more I find. The more I read and pray and commit myself to experience God daily, the more I am stunned by God’s beautiful presence within me and around me.
“You can become a blessing.”
–Dr. Rachel Naomi Remen
the value of genesis July 31, 2008
Posted by relsdork in God, bible, christian, religion, scripture.Tags: adam and eve, bible, christian scriptures, genesis, hebrew scriptures, old testament, religion, scripture, torah
1 comment so far
What happened thousands of years ago in a garden doesn’t matter in my life today. The Eden story has morals and millions of interpretations. It is fascinating to go through the takes of Genesis; it is inspiring to hear the morals; it is a beautiful story. However, it’s a beautiful story whose historical value is nothing compared to its metaphorical value. The message of the Genesis story is not that God did create life or the specifics of how God did so. The messages worth drawing from the text are never that shallow. “Why?” is the question we should be continually asking. Why would God create Adam and Eve, knowing that they would fall? Why go through the trouble? I believe it was to give them choice. Humans are created not for the sake of God, but for the sake of humans. So that we will have the knowledge beyond fact and instinct: knowledge of conscious decision-making skills and a moral compass. So that humanity will have the ability to choose. God did it so we could have the choice to choose a way of living life and understand that choice.
I don’t think God created us for God or out of some kind of need. I don’t think that God needs anything… Because God is God. What could God possibly need from us? I think humanity exists for humanity’s sake. So that we can live and feel and love. Whatever pain or joy there may be in that, I find the most perfect beauty not based on how happy each of us are or the greater utility of the world, but because it is real… because everything has meaning to us and because that meaning is real. Without this world, there would be no love. God created love and we are a necessary part of that. God created meaning and we are a necessary part of that. For me, there is no more profound truth than the reality of meaning. That said, what the heck do I know, eh?
In any case, it is abundantly clear to me that the point of the creation story is not the specifics of how and when God created the world… that there were two people living someplace called “Eden” means squat. If the meaning you find in the creation story is that God is all-powerful and created the world out of nothing, you’re not reading Genesis with your “thinking cap” on.
Biblical literacy should not simply mean that the Bible has been read and that passages have been memorized; it should mean that available resources have been used to supplement the material so that it could be understood to the deepest extent possible. History, archaeology, biology, philosophy, sociology, linguistics, psychology, literature… all frameworks should be applied to best understand the Bible’s themes, context, and relevance. An interdisciplinary approach should be taken when studying the Bible instead of simply taking it at face value. It is stupidity to read the Bible at a literalist level since the Bible is, in fact, a translation that cannot fully translate over both language and history. Human advancement is in vain if we cannot use the brilliance of our species to understand that which we like to say has the most meaning.
If there is nothing anyone can take on faith, the most “sure” claim is that this world exists. And if there is a God and if God did create it or create us or create anything, then this is it. Beyond it? An afterlife… whatever, maybe. But this is here and I think I can know that much. If there is anything I should be working for, it should be this world, because I know it’s here and that if God created it, God must have liked the idea of it being around. If no one created it? Then everything I do matters because it is all that matters. I think I should be working for humanity and the betterment of it. I think I should be helping people where I can, whether that means being there for others when they are hurting or whether it means giving money to women trying to make lives for themselves in Africa. I believe that that means trying to respect this earth, to enjoy nature… whether that means not littering, driving a more gas-efficient car, or giving money to causes which try to save nature.
The most profound truth is the reality of meaning. If this creation/world/bang means anything, maybe we should act like it.
if i were to translate the first line of genesis July 30, 2008
Posted by relsdork in God, christian, religion.Tags: bible, genesis, hebrew scriptures, scripture, torah
add a comment
In one of my classes, we discussed the first line of Genesis and the words and letters in Hebrew that form it. Based on my understanding of Hebrew and the intentionalities of words and letters, if I were to translate the first line of Genesis, it would read as follows:
In a beginning of this thought, the Divine created mother earth and the beyonds and word to tell of this creation.
exodus 3.14 July 28, 2008
Posted by relsdork in God, christian, religion.Tags: exodus, exodus 3.14, hebrew scriptures, old testament, scripture, torah
add a comment
God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.”
~Exodus 3:14