jump to navigation

My Tea is Cold March 19, 2009

Posted by relsdork in God, bible, christian, environment, nature, religion, scripture.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

So when I sat down to begin my Bible study, I had a giant mug of piping hot, fresh green tea. It’s now cold and I haven’t drank any of it, because I got incredibly excited and somehow just lost 2 hours of my life in scripture without noticing it. I still have more scripture to read through and some other reading to complete, as per my Lenten commitment.

ANYWAY…

Tonight I got to the Sermon on the Mount, in Matthew. If you’ve ever wondered why it is on a mountain in Matthew and on a plain in Luke, here you go: Matthew is writing for a Jewish audience and therefore, his placement of Jesus on a mountain has Mosaic parallels which resonate with his audience. Similarly, Luke is writing for a Hellenistic audience, who appreciates more a Jesus who stands level with them, as an equal.

On a similar note, within this lovely speech, Jesus says (in Matthew), “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” The funny thing about that, though, is that the word which is translated as “perfect” from the Greek, means something very different in the original. It means something more to the effect of: “live to your maximum potential.” In short, “give God’s work your all.” Again, however, there is a difference in Luke’s version, which doesn’t say perfect at all, but rather says “compassionate.” This is, again, because Luke is writing to a Greek audience. Because Greek ethics are more situational, the epitome of goodness in Greek society is compassion, and therefore it makes most sense to think of “perfection” as “compassion.”

Might I add that both of these “revised” translations make marvelous sense when viewed from a lens of process theology.

Next, I came upon the section of the sermon in Matthew which talks about the Law (beginning at 5.17). This section is unique to Matthew. Interesting, considering that Matthew was the writer orienting his words toward a Jewish audience. Could this view have been unique to Jewish Christianity, or was this something that simply wouldn’t have been emphasized or made much sense to a gentile audience?

Also, way back in my first year of college, I recall my RelS 99 professor saying that it was likely that the Pharisees were not so much an enemy of the Jesus movement (the Sadducees seem the more likely suspects). In scripture, however, they certainly take the most criticisms oriented toward Judaism’s legal system. I don’t know that his view represents scholarly consensus, but going over my notes from RelS 151, I now know why that theory makes sense– the Pharisees are anti-Hellenization. For a splinter group of Jews proselytizing to gentiles, Hellenization was their friend. In Jesus’ death, the gospel was for everyone and the Pharisees became the angry old ladies at church who didn’t want to see change.

And on a mostly unrelated note….

The Tree of Knowledge of Life and Death… my notes say, “God puts the tree there so that Adam knows he can exist without it.” This cyclical world, where it is easy to fall subject to ennui and lose touch with our spiritual sides, where it seems quite simple to live subject only to the laws of physics, is infused with spirit, hidden within metaphorical hedges… We are better than lives of routine and common courtesy. We needn’t be sucked into such mundane existences if we continue to eat from the Tree of Life, to grow ourselves in God and Spirit in ways that cannot be broken by the laws of this world. True knowledge and spirituality transcend time and space so that they daily land us in our inner Edens.

“There are two trees in the garden… and too much of religion is stuck at the wrong tree. Does it bring Life? Eat from that tree.”
–Rev. Yvette Flunder

Our goal is to be in the world, but not of it– to fully engage in this world and delve into the majesty of Nature, but understand that pure physicality is not enough to nourish our souls. Whatever magical experience a tromp through the forest might provide us, it can only ever be elevated by praying while we dig our fingers into the soil…

I guess it’s true that if we seek, we find. Even more true, however, is that the more I seek, the more I find. The more I read and pray and commit myself to experience God daily, the more I am stunned by God’s beautiful presence within me and around me.

“You can become a blessing.”
–Dr. Rachel Naomi Remen

god and creativity August 26, 2008

Posted by relsdork in God, christian, nature, religion.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

God is Natural. God could not be anything but Natural. Divinity is present in all forms of reality and reality is a projection of God’s creativity and our creativity. Reality is a continuing process of creativity, created by God and Humanity simultaneously.

destruction August 23, 2008

Posted by relsdork in God, christian, environment, nature, religion, struggle.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

“God must share responsibility with the world for our existence, for our ability to be kind and cruel. But now that we are here, we must accept responsibility for what we do. God cannot save us from ourselves or from the rest of the world upon which we depend.” –C. Robert Mesle

At this point in the history of the earth, we need to cooperate with the environment in a level of consciousness that we have yet to approach. The state of the planet is approaching a point of no return; if humanity, the previously and currently most destructive force in the web of the earth, does not begin to relate to the earth and truly understand and experience our interconnectedness to all things, we risk complete and irreversible destruction of the planet which we have called home for centuries.

views that guide my behavior August 13, 2008

Posted by relsdork in God, christian, environment, nature, religion.
Tags: , , ,
1 comment so far

 

I think Humanity exists for Humanity’s sake, so that we can live and feel and love. Whatever pain or joy there may be in that, I find the most perfect beauty not based on how happy each of us are or the greater utility of the world, but because it is real… because everything has meaning to us and because that meaning is real. For me, there is no more profound truth than the reality of meaning.

I see nature as a beautiful miracle. The chances of life coming together in this place and in this way are ridiculously small, and the blessing of a consciousness that allows us to understand that should (should) inspire a world to appreciate it. This system is a blip in time (as far as the eternity of the universe is concerned), and it seems to me only logical that we would want to prolong this miraculous experience of Life as long as possible. And, of course, that involves protecting the world that sustains us.

reciprocity July 28, 2008

Posted by relsdork in God, christian, nature, religion.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Driving home today was awesome. The sky was stunning… watching the rain from a distance, it looked like the clouds were bleeding into the mountains. It was amazing.

Symbolic Reciprocity

We were talking about the Theory of Reciprocity a while back in Religion and Anthropology. Obviously, the idea of developing these ideas is to apply it to religion.

It applies beautifully to Grace. In order to create and sustain the long term relationship, we give back. God’s gift (of pretty much everything) is so huge that it we are not capable of a balanced reciprocity. So we give back symbolically. We praise, we do God’s work, show God’s love, and give to humanity.

A mother births her child, raises it, provides food and shelter and love and education. What can a child possibly give back? A child gives its mother a flower or a picture… it’s symbolic, because the child cannot possibly repay its mother for all of her incredible gifts.

What a great God to give us so much, knowing we cannot possibly repay him.

What a beautiful sky today.

western god July 25, 2008

Posted by relsdork in God, christian, church, environment, nature, religion.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
2 comments

 

The dominant Western view of God has traditionally contributed to religious views of earthly stewardship at best, dominance at worst. The Genesis account has most often been interpreted as giving man dominance over women, animals, plants, and all other elements of the earth, with God acting as an external agent, outside of natural order and nature itself. Science and the progress of scientific understanding of our natural world has been positioned against God, as a fundamentally Other way of approaching the natural world and therefore contradictory to a truly religious approach to nature. Therefore, environmental ethics as they are presented by the scientific community are rejected as counter to God and a reliance on God’s wisdom. These views are not only dangerous to the planet, but bankrupt in their moral relevance. A truly ethical approach to the environment should be one of responsibility, connection, and mutual reliance.