i am temporal July 13, 2009
Posted by relsdork in God, nature, religion.Tags: books, life, process theology, religion
add a comment
Preface:I am reading a book on process theology (derived from Whitehead’s process philosophy, which you may or may not be familiar with). Process theology is hard to explain, not only because it requires a familiarity with religious language used for centuries (while it also turns such language on its head and completely redefines much of religious language, most notably the term “God”) but because it requires a degree of familiarity with science and nature. It’s like the high culture of religion, but without the pretensions. Or something.
While I will avoid trying to explain process theology, I’ll try to explain some of what’s going on in my head (if I haven’t lost all of that exciting bubble that happened right before I decided an introduction was necessary… crap).
Here is a quotation (which makes more sense if you understand process theology, but whatever):
“We have bodies and hands that can reach out and pull a trigger or grab a child. God does not. So we can overrule God’s freedom in ways that God cannot. God is everywhere and everytime. God can make freedom possible for an entire universe, moving it through an evolutionary process to create a universe of experience. We cannot. We are only here and now. Our powers are ours, not God’s. And God’s powers are God’s, not ours. God cannot overrule our freedom.”
Taken out of its context, this quote could be taken to mean that God acts somehow “consciously” as a controlling force in evolution, which is not so. Just to clarify.
I guess what’s going through my head right now is the crazy reality that something always exists (I’m calling this “God”). There is always an energy bouncing between the tiniest elements of existence. It has these elements reacting to each other in enormously complex ways that are both predictable and unpredictable. Through an amazing domino effect taking literally an infinite amount of time, they have led to me and my temporal existence.
What’s amazing about my existence, though it’s so much more temporally limited than many other existences (actual occasions), is that I seem to have consciousness. While freedom extends to every particle of the universe, I can make choices which take into account how those choices will affect the future and an emotional reaction to things. I have morality. Thus, what makes my existence quite spectacular is how I can use this “morality” to guide my decisions and choices in ways that can have lasting consequence and understand that in each moment of choice. I can try to orient the world, in whatever small way, toward a reality that is pleasurable and meaningful to everyone else and whoever else might come after.
But holy crap! I only have 50 or 60 years left! In the grand scheme of things, my existence is a tiny blip, but in the grand scheme of things, my existence has weight because of the magic of consciousness which somehow manifested out of the chance freedom of every little element bouncing around before I came into being. I am a miracle in that I am a possibility out of a bazillion possibilities and I have the capacity to understand that. I understand that not only in a way which can lead me to be remarkably grateful for the chance arrangement of matter and energy that is me, but in a way makes me aware of the lasting footprint I will have, of the ripples that I create in every moment by using a light bulb or saying a word to someone hugging my cat or driving my car or eating zucchini. Holy Jesus, I am so meaningful!
So (gosh darn it), I’d better do something meaningful.
Book: Process Theology: A Basic Introduction by C. Robert Mesle
what do i mean when i say “god”? June 22, 2009
Posted by relsdork in God, christian, religion.Tags: christianity, God, panentheism, process theology, religion
2 comments
This is the hardest thing to relate. When I say God, I mean the panentheistic God of Process Theology… the God that is present in all forms of life yet extends beyond all forms. God is not the all-powerful, all-knowing God that most would define God as. The past is done, the future is not yet… God acts in the now. God has no hands but our hands. I would describe God as the form of ideal Humanity and morality that is present in all forms of Life. God is communicated through acts of compassion and cries for justice and God exists in multiple forms. I believe that God is a both/and God that feels the needs of all peoples and lives in inspiration toward compassionate efforts to alleviate the pains all forms of Life experience and strive toward the creation of a world characterized by compassionate mutual understanding. I really don’t know how to describe my views in a coherent way. Think “collective unconscious” and add morality. I dunno.
I think it’s cool to think that humanity’s sense of morality might be some kind of larger connection, since we all seem to share basic moral concepts, but I think while the exploration of divinity and its play in life is awesome, attempts to define and box it are ultimately damaging. Once you claim true knowledge of divinity, you derive authority from it… and that only ever seems to be abused. I like to think of God as existing in everything as goodness, but also that sense of goodness that seems to extend past living things in a kind of intangible presence that connects us in compassion and love and things like that… kind of like Brahman in a way. That probably doesn’t make sense because I think a lot of the time it’s hard to make real sense out of, but if I could, it would become a list.
My Tea is Cold March 19, 2009
Posted by relsdork in God, bible, christian, environment, nature, religion, scripture.Tags: bible, christianity, comparative religious studies, God, hebrew scriptures, jesus, liberal, nature, process theology, religion, religious studies, scripture
add a comment
So when I sat down to begin my Bible study, I had a giant mug of piping hot, fresh green tea. It’s now cold and I haven’t drank any of it, because I got incredibly excited and somehow just lost 2 hours of my life in scripture without noticing it. I still have more scripture to read through and some other reading to complete, as per my Lenten commitment.
ANYWAY…
Tonight I got to the Sermon on the Mount, in Matthew. If you’ve ever wondered why it is on a mountain in Matthew and on a plain in Luke, here you go: Matthew is writing for a Jewish audience and therefore, his placement of Jesus on a mountain has Mosaic parallels which resonate with his audience. Similarly, Luke is writing for a Hellenistic audience, who appreciates more a Jesus who stands level with them, as an equal.
On a similar note, within this lovely speech, Jesus says (in Matthew), “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” The funny thing about that, though, is that the word which is translated as “perfect” from the Greek, means something very different in the original. It means something more to the effect of: “live to your maximum potential.” In short, “give God’s work your all.” Again, however, there is a difference in Luke’s version, which doesn’t say perfect at all, but rather says “compassionate.” This is, again, because Luke is writing to a Greek audience. Because Greek ethics are more situational, the epitome of goodness in Greek society is compassion, and therefore it makes most sense to think of “perfection” as “compassion.”
Might I add that both of these “revised” translations make marvelous sense when viewed from a lens of process theology.
Next, I came upon the section of the sermon in Matthew which talks about the Law (beginning at 5.17). This section is unique to Matthew. Interesting, considering that Matthew was the writer orienting his words toward a Jewish audience. Could this view have been unique to Jewish Christianity, or was this something that simply wouldn’t have been emphasized or made much sense to a gentile audience?
Also, way back in my first year of college, I recall my RelS 99 professor saying that it was likely that the Pharisees were not so much an enemy of the Jesus movement (the Sadducees seem the more likely suspects). In scripture, however, they certainly take the most criticisms oriented toward Judaism’s legal system. I don’t know that his view represents scholarly consensus, but going over my notes from RelS 151, I now know why that theory makes sense– the Pharisees are anti-Hellenization. For a splinter group of Jews proselytizing to gentiles, Hellenization was their friend. In Jesus’ death, the gospel was for everyone and the Pharisees became the angry old ladies at church who didn’t want to see change.
And on a mostly unrelated note….
The Tree of Knowledge of Life and Death… my notes say, “God puts the tree there so that Adam knows he can exist without it.” This cyclical world, where it is easy to fall subject to ennui and lose touch with our spiritual sides, where it seems quite simple to live subject only to the laws of physics, is infused with spirit, hidden within metaphorical hedges… We are better than lives of routine and common courtesy. We needn’t be sucked into such mundane existences if we continue to eat from the Tree of Life, to grow ourselves in God and Spirit in ways that cannot be broken by the laws of this world. True knowledge and spirituality transcend time and space so that they daily land us in our inner Edens.
“There are two trees in the garden… and too much of religion is stuck at the wrong tree. Does it bring Life? Eat from that tree.”
–Rev. Yvette Flunder
Our goal is to be in the world, but not of it– to fully engage in this world and delve into the majesty of Nature, but understand that pure physicality is not enough to nourish our souls. Whatever magical experience a tromp through the forest might provide us, it can only ever be elevated by praying while we dig our fingers into the soil…
I guess it’s true that if we seek, we find. Even more true, however, is that the more I seek, the more I find. The more I read and pray and commit myself to experience God daily, the more I am stunned by God’s beautiful presence within me and around me.
“You can become a blessing.”
–Dr. Rachel Naomi Remen
process theology January 7, 2009
Posted by relsdork in God, christian, environment, nature, religion.Tags: c. robert mesle, environmentalism, process theology
add a comment
The God of Process Theology offers a constructive framework with which to approach the environment. Seeing God as acting within all forms of life, we can understand the value of life and respect them as having equal rights to existing and flourishing. In viewing all forms as actual occasions, we can see ourselves in community and act in mutual respect and compassionate service toward all other life forms.
“On this planet, we are probably the creatures most capable of perceiving and responding to God’s vision of a different, better world. God’s primary avenue for liberation is through responsive human hearts. We can wait for supernatural miracles, or we can roll up our sleeves with God and get to work.” –C. Robert Mesle
god and creativity August 26, 2008
Posted by relsdork in God, christian, nature, religion.Tags: God, nature, process theology
add a comment
God is Natural. God could not be anything but Natural. Divinity is present in all forms of reality and reality is a projection of God’s creativity and our creativity. Reality is a continuing process of creativity, created by God and Humanity simultaneously.
destruction August 23, 2008
Posted by relsdork in God, christian, environment, nature, religion, struggle.Tags: c. robert mesle, christianity, environment, God, nature, process theology, religion
add a comment
“God must share responsibility with the world for our existence, for our ability to be kind and cruel. But now that we are here, we must accept responsibility for what we do. God cannot save us from ourselves or from the rest of the world upon which we depend.” –C. Robert Mesle
At this point in the history of the earth, we need to cooperate with the environment in a level of consciousness that we have yet to approach. The state of the planet is approaching a point of no return; if humanity, the previously and currently most destructive force in the web of the earth, does not begin to relate to the earth and truly understand and experience our interconnectedness to all things, we risk complete and irreversible destruction of the planet which we have called home for centuries.
when i say “god” August 18, 2008
Posted by relsdork in God, christian, religion.Tags: christian, christianity, God, process theology
add a comment
When I say God, I mean the panentheistic God of Process Theology… the God that is present in all forms of life yet extends beyond all forms. God lures us to do God’s will, but is not the all-powerful, all-knowing God that most would define God as. The past is done, the future is not yet… God acts in the now. God has no hands but our hands.
my definition of God July 27, 2008
Posted by relsdork in God, christian, religion.Tags: christianity, God, panentheism, process theology, religion
6 comments
I would describe God as the form of ideal Humanity and morality that is present in all forms of Life. God is communicated through acts of compassion and cries for justice and God exists in multiple forms. I believe that God is a both/and God that hears the needs of all peoples and tries to inspire humans toward compassion to alleviate the pains all forms of Life experience and strive toward the creation of a world characterized by compassionate mutual understanding.
I am a panentheist.
western god July 25, 2008
Posted by relsdork in God, christian, church, environment, nature, religion.Tags: christianity, environmentalism, God, nature, process theology, religion, ucc, united church of christ
2 comments
The dominant Western view of God has traditionally contributed to religious views of earthly stewardship at best, dominance at worst. The Genesis account has most often been interpreted as giving man dominance over women, animals, plants, and all other elements of the earth, with God acting as an external agent, outside of natural order and nature itself. Science and the progress of scientific understanding of our natural world has been positioned against God, as a fundamentally Other way of approaching the natural world and therefore contradictory to a truly religious approach to nature. Therefore, environmental ethics as they are presented by the scientific community are rejected as counter to God and a reliance on God’s wisdom. These views are not only dangerous to the planet, but bankrupt in their moral relevance. A truly ethical approach to the environment should be one of responsibility, connection, and mutual reliance.
i am fresh July 4, 2008
Posted by relsdork in christian, religion.Tags: brian swimme, environmentalism, process theology, the universe, thomas berry
add a comment
“The universe comes to us, each being and each moment announcing its thrilling news: I am fresh. To understand the universe you must understand me.”
–Thomas Berry and Brian Swimme, The Universe Story